Re: Google Earth Image
Inbox
| Susan Wolfson <susan.wolfson@hannahsolar.com> | Fri, Jul 29, 2016, 12:18 PM |  | |
| to Mark, me |
I think the property around the building is good. I feel we should go in strong, showing the max we can offset doing whatever is the most economical. We can always take it down from there.
Google Earth Image
Inbox
| Mark Cann <mark.cann@hannahsolar.com> | Jul 29, 2016, 9:00 AM | | |
| to Susan, me |
Susi,
Do you know if there is any space around for ground mount or are we restrained to the roof?
Thanks
Mark
FW: National Beverage Screen Printing
Inbox
| Mark Cann <mark.cann@hannahsolar.com> | Aug 1, 2016, 11:31 AM | | |
| to me |
couple of options
—–Original Message—–
From: Kyle Benson
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 11:24 AM
To: Mark Cann; Drew Cates
Subject: Re: National Beverage Screen Printing
Two options; one Flush on the S side, one fixed on both sides using the Schletter rail system with S5 Clips on the Seams. Neither gets close to 1MW, sorry. Let me know what needs revision.
Kyle Benson
Design Technician,
Market Development
Hannah Solar, LLC
________________________________________
From: Mark Cann
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 9:00 AM
To: Kyle Benson; Drew Cates
Subject: National Beverage Screen Printing
Guys,
This system can go as large as 1MW AC but we don’t have the square footage for it so I would like to max the roof out. Sky lights are a pain in the ass.
Let me know of any questions.
Thanks
Mark
OPTION 3 – 556.7kW
From: Kyle Benson
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 2:18 PM
To: Susan Wolfson
Cc: Mark Cann
Subject: Re: ground mounts
See attached. This will have to be three separate systems, as I can’t run jumpers from ground – roof – ground. Not sure about building GMs in the area that appears to be a dry pond. Topo doesn’t appear terrible, but it’s gotta be lower than the surrounding land. Let me know your thoughts. Kyle Benson
Design Technician,
Market Development
Hannah Solar, LLC
